All news
productregulation

X Kills Revenue Sharing for Original Content Rewards

16 Aug 2026

X is shutting down its Revenue Sharing program and replacing it with a new initiative called Original Content Rewards, according to a company announcement. The move marks a significant shift in how the platform pays creators — trading a system built on payout volume for one explicitly designed around original, high-engagement content.

What's changing

X will immediately stop accepting new participants into Revenue Sharing. Existing participants can keep earning under the current program through September 7, after which they'll need to apply for Original Content Rewards starting September 8. Notably, participants in the new program will still be required to subscribe to one of X's Premium tiers.

To qualify for Original Content Rewards, creators will need:

  • 500 verified followers
  • 500,000 Home Timeline impressions from verified users within 90 days

This is a stricter, more engagement-specific bar than what Revenue Sharing previously required.

Why the change

X's Allegra Jacchia said the existing Revenue Sharing program "had reached a point where its incentives were misaligned," adding that creators should focus on bringing net new content to the platform rather than maximizing payouts. This follows an earlier move in April, when X reduced payments to aggregators and "clickbait" accounts — a signal that the platform has been trying to course-correct creator incentives for months before this larger overhaul.

Sources note that repeated reform attempts to Revenue Sharing have historically prompted complaints from popular accounts profiting under the existing system, and it's plausible similar pushback could resurface with this transition, though that remains to be seen.

Risks and open questions

The stricter qualification thresholds could exclude smaller creators who previously monetized successfully under Revenue Sharing, effectively narrowing the pool of eligible participants. Several important details remain unclear, including:

  • How payout amounts or rates will differ between the old and new programs
  • What specifically distinguishes "original content" from content that was previously acceptable
  • How many creators are currently affected by the transition
  • Whether the 500,000-impression threshold is measured on a rolling or fixed 90-day basis
  • What happens to creators who fail to meet the new thresholds

X has not yet addressed these gaps publicly.

Why founders should care

For founders building products, tools, or businesses that depend on X's creator ecosystem, this shift likely signals a broader industry direction: platforms may increasingly tie monetization to engagement-quality metrics rather than raw reach or output volume. This could inform how founders structure their own creator or affiliate incentive programs, especially if they're trying to avoid the same "misaligned incentives" problem X is now correcting.

Startups that rely on creator partnerships or influencer-driven distribution on X should probably expect monetization requirements to become more selective going forward, which may require adjusting outreach or partnership strategies in the coming months. It's also reasonably likely that some previously profitable aggregator-style accounts will see reduced viability under the new system, which could shift where creator attention and content distribution concentrate next.

Given the unresolved questions around payout structure and eligibility edge cases, founders with active stakes in X's creator economy should monitor developments closely between now and the September 8 application window.

Sources